Wednesday, August 17, 2016

Extension of Window Period for Retirees of the Banks for Joining the IBA Group Mediclaim Insurance Policy For the period ending 30th November, 2016.



A circular issued by AIBRF is reproduced below
Quote

Ref: 2016/529                                           Date: 16.08.2016

The Office Bearers/ Central Committee Members/ State Body Chiefs

Dear Comrades,

We below reproduce the communication issued by United India Insurance Company Ltd. On group medi-claim insurance scheme applicable to the bank retirees which is self explanatory.
   
    “Re: Extension of Window Period for Retirees of the Banks for    Joining the IBA Group Mediclaim Insurance Policy For the period ending 30th November, 2016.
We would like to inform you the window period for joining under retiree policy was initially closed on 31.03.2016. On request of the member banks it was further extended up to the period up to 31st May, 2016.
 Now we have been receiving request from the member banks to have one more chance to opt the retirees to join the IBA Group Mediclaim Insurance Policy(Retirees). We are pleased to inform you that the competent authority has decided to extend the window period for retirees and the proposals/options exercised on or before 30th September, 2016   by paying the full entitled premium only will be considered for inclusion. Thus please ensure that premium of leftover retirees received in the Bank's office on or before 30.09.2016 should reach us on or before 30.09.2016. This is a final and golden chance for the retirees to join and no further options after 1st October, 2016 for joining the scheme shall be allowed please note. ( Please note that those retirees opted out from this policy are not entitled to rejoin this scheme). 
At the time of renewal of the retirees’ policy only the following members will be covered.
1.     The existing employees covered under the EMPLOYEES policy and retired on or before 30th September, 2016 and their name should be there in the existing policy.
2.     The members covered under the existing retirees policy  and covered till 30th November, 2016 will be entitled to join the group Mediclaim policy  on the renewal of the policy by paying the  renewal


 premium.( Please note that those retirees opted out from this policy will be not covered at the time of renewal i.e. from 01st November, 2016.)
The Premium Charges.






We request you inform the all retirees at the earliest and remit the premium to us on or before 30th September, 2016.
Your early action will be highly solicited.”
    2. We request you to be guided by the above communication and take up the matter with the concerned bank management for its smooth implementation.

    3. As you are aware AIBRF has been consistently taking up issue of one more option to the left over to join the scheme. We are happy that it has been considered favorably.
    
    With Regards,

Yours Sincerely,     

 ( S.C.JAIN )
 GENERAL SECRETARY
  Unquote





Tuesday, August 9, 2016

Letter by Shri S.Ramchandran, former GM Bank of Baroda, to MD and CEO Bank of Baroda regarding pending claim for Hospitalisation - Domiciliary treatmen



We reproduce below the letter written by Shri S. Ramchandran to MD and CEO of Bank of Baroda
Quote
S. Ramachandran                                                       Kunal Icon, Building no.A8,
 Former General Manager Bank of Baroda.                Flat no. 104, Pimple Saudagar,
 Former Chairman & CEO - The Sangli Bank Ltd .    Aundh Camp, Pune 411027
(Now merged with ICICI Bank Ltd.)                           Tel: 020 27201012.
Former Administrator Madhavpura Mercantile   E-mail id-ramans1938@gmail.com
Co-op Bank Ltd (Ahmedabad)
Former Director General Maratha Chamber of Commerce Industries & Agriculture, Pune.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Shri P.S.Jayakumar,                                                      28TH July,2016
MD &CEO,BANK OF BARODA,         MOST URGENT             
BARODA CORPORATE CENTRE,
C-26,G-BLOCK,BABDRA KURLA COMPLEX,
BANDRA EAST,MUMBAI-400051

RE:- REMEDICAL INSURANCE SCHEME FOR RETIRED OFFICERS/EMPLOYEES;PROCEDURE FOR HOSPITALIZATION –DOMICILIARY TREATMENT-MY PENDING CLAIMS OVER          RS 93000/- SUBMITTED TO THE BANK

Thanks for Mr Jani, DGM HR OPERATION e mail of 18th July 2016 on the issue of reimbursement of my various bills relating to domiciliary treatment.

At the outset, I am amazed at the similarity in the reply sent by him now with that of the reply received from the Executive Director Mr. Joshi, vide his letter NO BCC/HRM/108/i-21/2058 sent way back on 25th February 2016.Both have emphasized that the issue regarding reimbursement of claims under domiciliary treatment is “under discussion between IBA and Insurance Company”. I am unable to understand the rationale for the inordinate and inexplicable delay in settling an important matter concerning the retirees especially when everything is in black and white. In fact the Executive Director has in unequivocal terms admitted that “the medical insurance policy for retired employees circulated by the Bank is arrived at by IBA with United India Insurance co. Ltd.  In the policy which the bank is referring for, the aspect of coverage of domiciliary treatments even for retired employees were crystal clear. Even in the presentation made to the IBA and the UFBU, the domiciliary treatment was covered for retirees. It is only after an after-thought, the insurance company has reneged from their contractual obligation. It is because of this, the UFBU who are one of the signatory to the insurance contract has been racking up this issue time and again. Since, the domiciliary treatment was covered in the MOU the Bank has issued the circular and is now taking up with the IBA.

 Even during my meeting with you on 14th march,2016 at Pune you promised me that on going  back to Mumbai, you would take up the matter with Mr. TANKASALE - CEO OF IBA AND THE CHAIRMAN OF UNITED INSURANCE CO in the matter and resolve the matter with in a period of one month and in the worst scenario you would pay the bills to the debit of the banks profit
and loss account.This assurance given by you was confirmed by me to you vide my email dated 15th april,2016.

Apart from the above it may be noted that I had sent several emails to you such as dated     18-11-2015,7-1-2016,27-1-2016,6-2-2016,7-3-2016 and 14-7-2016 on the above subject but regret to state that you preferred to remain silent in spite of the fact that bank was deficient in services as assumed in the banks circular dated 10th November,2015.  
By end of October, the one year term of the policy is coming to an end and hence it is necessary that the issue is sorted out without further procrastination. Banks’ reply sounds as if it is Indo- Pak dialogue which is lingering for ages.
To recapitulate, I have to state that the Bank has issued the circular No. BCC/BR/107.555 dated 10th November, 2015 which was published on its website wherein it is categorically stated that domiciliary treatment is covered. The bank has issued this circular based on a copy of the memorandum of understanding of IBA and the Insurers. Hence, everything is in black and white. We therefore do not see any rationale in prolonging the discussion.   The contract of Health Insurance cannot be rescinded arbitrarily. If the insurance company has reneged on its earlier contract, it is for the IBA to sort out the issue but without putting the retirees to difficulty. The IBA was in the forefront while dealing with the Insurance Company and therefore, they should take up the responsibility. It is for this reason, we have been shouting from the roof top to stop accepting the advice of IBA which is a un-registered and non – professional body without any responsibility and accountability.

The presentation made by the insurers clearly and categorically showed that domiciliary treatment is covered both for the serving and retired employees. The same was incorporated in the MOU. It is ironical that the coverage for retirees have been stealthily deleted which is against all cannons of justice and fair play.  The Bank should have immediately taken up the issue in the IBA Managing committee meetings and forced for a immediate resolution of the issue.  Strong arm tactics of the insurers should have been highlighted to the top management of the insurers  including their Board  which would have given positive results.

Since in the circular issued by the Bank, there is no ambiguity as far as coverage of domiciliary treatment is concerned, it is necessary that the bank should reimburse the amount and claim the same from the insurance company or the IBA.

 In this context ,I REQUEST YOUR ATTENTION TO THE PROVISIONS OF “CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT 1986. ACCORDINGLY I AM CONSUMER OF THE BANK FOR WHICH I HAVE PAID THE PREMIUM/FEES IN PURSUANCE OF BANKS CIRCULAR NO BCC:BR:107:555 DATED 10TH NOVEMBER,2015 FOR AVAILING THE SERVICES OF HEALTH INSURANCE POLICY.

IT is crystal clear in spite of compliances of all the formalities by the undersigned as a consumer ,by not sanctioning my claims bank is deficient in services as assumed in the above banks circular no BCC:BR:107:555 DATED 10TH NOVEMBER,2015.

In view of the above I request you to sanction and release ally my claims within 30 days  from the receipt of my this communication and also order the head office to pay my future bills that I will be submitting for treatment of self and my wife till the expiry of policy on 31-10-2016.

Thanking you.
With best regards,
YOURS SINCERELY,

S.RAMACHANDRAN
FORMER GM & PENSIONER
EMPLOYEE NO 14378


C.C. TO SHRI RAVI VENKATESAN  -  for information and necessary action please.
CHAIRMAN, BANK OF BARODA,
BARODA CORPORATE CENTRE,
BANDRA,MUMBAI 400051 

 Unquote



Saturday, July 30, 2016

DA payable to retirees from the month of Aug 2016 to Jan 2017 - 29 slabs increase

DEARNESS RELIEF PAYABLE TO PENSIONERS FROM :1st,AUGUST'16 TO JAN'17

Average Index
6261

INCREASE
29
Slabs
Dearness Relief to Pensioners who retired on or after 1st Day of January,1986
but before 1st Day of November,1992/ 1st July 1993.






Index

Basic Pension:



1415
Over 600
Up to 1250
1251 to 2000
2001 to 2130
Above 2130



948.05
778.25
466.95
240.55
%









Dearness Relief to Pensioners who retired on or after 1st Day of November,
1992/ 1st July 1993.












Up to 2400
2401 to 3850
3851 to 4100
Above 4100

1278
over 1148







447.3
370.62
217.26
115.02
%


Dearness Relief to Pensioners who retired on or after 1st April,1998.
Upto 3550
3551 to 5650
5651 to 6010
Above 6010

1144
Over 1684
274.56
228.8
137.28
68.64
%









Dearness Relief to Pensioners who retired on or after 1st November ,2002.



178.74
%
993
Over 2288







Dearness Relief to Pensioners who retired on or after 1st November,2007



128.4
%
856
Over 2836







Dearness relief to Pensioners who retired on or after 1st November,2012.



45.5
%
455
Over 4440
.pm./29.7.16









D.A calculator is available for calculating revised D.A. and difference. For calculating D.A , enter basic ( original basic without reducing commutation amount) and click on the calculate button. Revised D.A , Present D.A. and difference will be displayed on the calculator. Select appropriate retirement date range according to the date of retirement.

 
Click on the following link for  D A Calculator. 

  
D.A. Calculator


Friday, July 1, 2016

Supreme Court Proceedings on 100 per cent DA case and IBA Managment Comittee meeting on 24.06.2015 - AIBRF version

Circular issued by AIBRF is reproduced below
Quote
Ref:2016/490                                             Date:30.06.2016
The Office Bearers/ Central Committee Members/ State Body Chiefs
AIBRF
Dear Comrades,
Re: Civil Appeal No. 8420-8421 A.B.Kasturirangan & Others V/S Canara Bank & Others- 100 Percent DA Case in Supreme Court PROCEEDINGS ON 29.06.2016
The above two civil appeals along with 2 more civil appeals on the same subject came up our hearing in the Supreme Court on 29.06.2016.
2. Large section of bank retirees is keeping close watch on the progress of the case. We below give details in brief on the proceedings of the hearing on 29.06.2016 to enable our
membership to know correct position on the progress in the case.
(a) 5 Advocates appeared on behalf of the petitioners ( Retirees)
and 16 advocates appeared on behalf the Respondent ( Bank Managements & IBA )
(b) Regular hearing on these civil appeals could not take place on 29.06.2016.
(c) In the meantime, we understand Indian Bank Association has filed Intervention Application to become party in these civil appeals.
(d) The Bench has directed to list these applications along with the main matters in the month of January, 2017.
3. We find news are getting circulated in social media that the
appeals will come for final disposal in the month of January, 2017. It is not correct. Similarly, it is also not factually correct that pray for interim relief was heard and was not considered by the bench. In fact no such prayer was moved.
4. AIBRF is keeping close watch on the progress of the case, in particular IBA move to join the appeals as intervener, in view of interest of large number of retirees involved. We assure the membership we shall take appropriate steps , legal and other wise from time to time to protect interest of the retirees.

MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE MEETING OF IBA ON 24,06,2016
We have vide our circular no. 2016/485 dated 25.06.2016 advised the membership that the pending matters of retirees were not in the formal agenda of the meeting to remove the confusion getting created by news in circulation in the social media. We find that even after issuance of our above circular, news getting still widely spread among the retirees that after the meeting IBA has sent recommendations to the government for approval of 100 percent DA to pre-November 2002 retirees and improvement in family pension. According to our information which has been crossed check, no such recommendations have gone to the government from IBA  after the above meeting. We are issuing this clarification to remove confusion getting created among the membership due to circulation of such news. We assure that we shall come out with our communication as soon as there are developments in the matter for which our continuous efforts are on.
With Warm Greetings,
Yours Sincerely,
( S.C.JAIN )
GENERAL SECRETARY

Unquote
Source: AIBRF Website

Thursday, June 30, 2016

100 percent D.A. case in Supreme court - proceedings on 29/06/2016

The case regarding 100 percent D.A. neutralisation (A.B. Kasturirangan & others Vs Canara Bank & others ) came up for hearing on 29th June 2016, in Supreme Court of India.  Regular hearing of this case could not take place on the date. Hon Supreme  Court directed to list the case in the month of Jan 2017.