Letter by Shri R.K. Pathak ( President Resigned Bank Employees Welfare Aassociation) to GS/President ,AIBPARC is reproduced below.
Quote
Quote
Dear Sir/s,
You are well aware of our [RBEWA] efforts for justice to resignees for second pension option through Judiciary. You have also been giving patience hearing to my presentation in the Meeting dated 14/03/2016 at Hyderabad.
It is reliably understood that " IBA has gathered information regarding the number of Resignees and others , it is about 5000.It is done to assess the cost."
The information is gathered from the Bank of Resignees [ Non Pension Optees] completed 20 years of service and CRS employees.
In view of the Banks loosing cases against Resignees & CRS employees, IBA may soften their stand & issue is expected to be resolved soon but IBA may play game to give Pension prospectively.
In view of the above probability, RBEWA plans to Intensify its effort in SC by tagging the issues of Bank Resignees to Larger Bench & could succeed in the direction on 08/03/2016. [ Copy Attached]
I have already explained about litigation cost in SC and requested you to provide the list of Resignees of your Bank.
Although there are 4000-5000 Resignees , but only 400- 500 Resignees are our members in legal battle & still 90% are either ignorant of our activity or not allowed to join us.
As IBA has gathered information from Banks, it is certainly available at their HO and with your good office & liaison, you can definitely get it for us & WE expect your support in the matter.
HOPE YOU WILL HELP US IN THE MATTER.
Thanks & Regards
Pathak R K
9373053695
You are well aware of our [RBEWA] efforts for justice to resignees for second pension option through Judiciary. You have also been giving patience hearing to my presentation in the Meeting dated 14/03/2016 at Hyderabad.
It is reliably understood that " IBA has gathered information regarding the number of Resignees and others , it is about 5000.It is done to assess the cost."
The information is gathered from the Bank of Resignees [ Non Pension Optees] completed 20 years of service and CRS employees.
In view of the Banks loosing cases against Resignees & CRS employees, IBA may soften their stand & issue is expected to be resolved soon but IBA may play game to give Pension prospectively.
In view of the above probability, RBEWA plans to Intensify its effort in SC by tagging the issues of Bank Resignees to Larger Bench & could succeed in the direction on 08/03/2016. [ Copy Attached]
I have already explained about litigation cost in SC and requested you to provide the list of Resignees of your Bank.
Although there are 4000-5000 Resignees , but only 400- 500 Resignees are our members in legal battle & still 90% are either ignorant of our activity or not allowed to join us.
As IBA has gathered information from Banks, it is certainly available at their HO and with your good office & liaison, you can definitely get it for us & WE expect your support in the matter.
HOPE YOU WILL HELP US IN THE MATTER.
Thanks & Regards
Pathak R K
9373053695
Unquote
This Group https://www.facebook.com/groups/992700487489203/ is For All India Centre Govt and State Govt Employees of New Pension Scheme Only & to Fight Against New Pension Scheme.
ReplyDeleteAll India Centre Govt and State Govt Employees who come under NPS and joined after 01.01.2004 should join this group. So that we can unite against new pension scheme.
This group is all about New Pension Scheme only and to give more and more information about NPS/CPF to Govt Employees of Centre Govt and State Govts.
This Group https://www.facebook.com/groups/992700487489203/ is For All India Centre Govt and State Govt Employees of New Pension Scheme Only & to Fight Against New Pension Scheme.
ReplyDeleteAll India Centre Govt and State Govt Employees who come under NPS and joined after 01.01.2004 should join this group. So that we can unite against new pension scheme.
This group is all about New Pension Scheme only and to give more and more information about NPS/CPF to Govt Employees of Centre Govt and State Govts.
Kindly go through the record of the proceedings of 8/3/16, quoted in the article. The record of the proceedings of Supreme Court mentions to tag the above Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.5716 to 5719 of 2016 with Civil Appeal No.14739 of 2015 (arising out of SLP (C) 24108 of 2012 ). HOWEVER, if one opens up the link for BOTH Civil appeal No.14739 of 2015 and SLP(C) of 24108 of 2012, they indicate different subject matter of cases. It appears that these two case numbers are wrongly mentioned in the order. Will Mr.Pathak inform the correct case number to which his petition has been tagged ?
ReplyDelete